Recording of HOA Meetings

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Tom@CarterRanchHomeowners.com
    Administrator
    • Apr 2016
    • 103

    #1

    Recording of HOA Meetings

    Well, I guess Mary Chaira (Snow Property Services) got another burr under her saddle about little ole me. I am the only person who records the meetings so that we homeowners will have a record of what is ACTUALLY said (like when the board unanimously voted to make the late fee for dues 20 days late, $5 and then actually charge $78 more or less). Ah well, I digress. At last night's meeting, they developed a NEW rule and regulation. This time in an attempt to restrict your ability to have the meeting facts at hand. The video I made has the board referring to the revised Arizona Revised Statute (Revised was typed twice on purpose) 33-1804. They said that, according to this new revised statute (law) they now have the right to do what is written on the attached PDF (Scan0005.pdf). Just a few problems with that. Also attached is the revised statute ARS 33-1804, Revised and passed into law April 28, 2017 from House Bill HB2411. Please note that anything in red is mine. If you wish to read it directly from the Arizona website, go here : http://www.azleg.gov/ars/33/01804.htm .

    1. "Any recording shall not be disseminated to members outside the association without the written consent of the Board." If you are a member, you are inside the association. If you are not a member, you are outside the association. Not sure how you can be a member and be outside the association. The ignorance of this Board (actually run by Mary Chaira Snow Property Services) is astounding. Any intelligent HOA Board would have run a document such as this through a reputable lawyer. No authority in the law to give them this power.

    2. "No recording of a meeting shall be posted or otherwise made available on the internet without the written consent of the Board." No authority in the law to give them this power.

    3. "Homeowners who wish to record or tape the Board Meeting must sign an acknowledgement form BEFORE beginning taping." If you read the ARS 33-1804 that the Board stated, the line that is significant is the one that reads "The Board of Directors of the association SHALL NOT require ADVANCE NOTICE of the audio taping or video taping .....".

    The blatant ignorance, arrogance and disrespect of the law is rampant with this board.

    Also, last night the President of the Board, Lance vanHorn, made a statement that if anyone in the room wished to speak but not be recorded, all they had to do was make notice and the Board would declare the meeting closed and shut down the recording. Mary Chaira of Snow Property Services has stated several times over the last few years how astute she is with the law. However, the law is really specific as to what constitutes reason for closed meetings. There are 5 and only 5 and a person's desire to not be recorded is not one of the five.

    1. Legal advice from an attorney for the board or the association. On final resolution of any matter for which the board received legal advice or that concerned pending or contemplated litigation, the board may disclose information about that matter in an open meeting except for matters that are required to remain confidential by the terms of a settlement agreement or judgment.

    2. Pending or contemplated litigation.

    3. Personal, health or financial information about an individual member of the association, an individual employee of the association or an individual employee of a contractor for the association, including records of the association directly related to the personal, health or financial information about an individual member of the association, an individual employee of the association or an individual employee of a contractor for the association.

    4. Matters relating to the job performance of, compensation of, health records of or specific complaints against an individual employee of the association or an individual employee of a contractor of the association who works under the direction of the association.

    5. Discussion of a member's appeal of any violation cited or penalty imposed by the association except on request of the affected member that the meeting be held in an open session.


    Just for clarification, the attached paper from the HOA (scan0005.pdf) has "PROPOSAL" across the page but the Board voted last night (05-23-2017) and unanimously adopted this paper as written.


    scan0005.pdf ARS HB2411 Signed into law by Governor Doug Ducey.pdf
    Attached Files
  • Tom@CarterRanchHomeowners.com
    Administrator
    • Apr 2016
    • 103

    #2
    Well, it is all resolved now. I filed a complaint with the Arizona Attorney General's office and they forwarded it on to the Arizona Department of Real Estate. it required a $500 filing fee but, in my humble opinion, it was well worth the price. This board and Mary Chaira need to be stopped from their provocative lawlessness. last week the Department of Real Estate found in my favor and has adjudicated that the HOA must pay me the $500 filing fee. (Insert happy dance here).

    The HOA was given 20 days to respond to the Arizona Department of Real Estate. On the 20th day, the lawyer from Maxwell and Morgan sent me a letter once again telling me basically that my flagpole is an eyesore to the subdivision. As almost and after thought he added to the end of the letter:

    In addition to the foregoing, the Association has requested that I address another issue with you. Apparently, you filed a complaint with the Department of Real Estate on September 29, 2017, which the Association just recently received. Your complaint alleges that the Association’s rules regarding the recordation of open Board Meetings violate A.R.S. § 33-1804. However, you are mistaken. At the Board Meeting that took place on August 22, 2017, the Association, in recognition of the statutory changes that had just taken effect, acknowledged that their prior policy regarding recordation of meetings null and void and no longer enforceable due to the change in the law. The meeting minutes confirming this action will be available once they have been approved by the Board. As such, the Association does not currently have limitations on the recordation of open Board Meetings. Your complaint with the Department of Real Estate is thus based on an outdated rule that had been revoked more than a month before you filed your petition. The Association requests that you withdraw your petition/complaint with the Department of Real Estate and provide confirmation to the Association that the same has been withdrawn.


    The Association looks forward to your response.

    Sincerely,
    Chad M. Gallacher


    My response was as follows:

    Lastly, you suggest that I should confirm what does not exist. You want me to attest to the fact that the HOA has revised its stance on the recording of meetings (and, by now, you should understand why it is so important for me to record them). How can I do that when the board has not made any official changes. The “official” website does not have, as of the end of November, revised Rules and Regulations. As a matter of fact, it does not have ANY Rules and Regulations. They have been deleted. At the November quarterly meeting, I patiently awaited a copy of the August Minutes that you reference. At the end of the 14 November meeting, Mr. vanHorn (president) suggested passing out copies of the August minutes and Ms. Chaira abruptly said no to this suggestion as they had not been voted on and approved as yet by the board. So, as of November 14th, the existing Rules and Regulations still stood as adopted in May. You further erroneously state “At the Board Meeting that took place on August 22, 2017, the Association, in recognition of the statutory changes that had just taken effect, acknowledged that their prior policy regarding recordation of meetings null and void and no longer enforceable due to the change in the law.” I have Ms. Chaira recorded at the May meeting as stating that the new rule was based on the RECENT CHANGE to ARS 33-1804. This, by the way, became law on 28 APRIL, 2017, almost a month to the day BEFORE the May Meeting. At least she was correct then. Do you not verify anything you write? If I were to do as you say and tell the Arizona Department of Real Estate that all is fixed, I would be complicit in your aberration of the truth. Unlike you and Ms. Chaira, I prefer to be honest and factual.

    If your letter was factual and truthful, all you had to do was write a letter to Mr. Gardner and simply state that it was all corrected in August. Your failure to write this letter and to ask me to save you from this prevarication tells me that, if we now see the minutes from August show up with the revision, it will most likely have been revised in recent days and simply posted as August. Be aware that there is at least one member of the board that will tell the truth.


    HOA Lack of Rules and Regs 12-04-17.JPG

    In May, when the Rules and Regulations were changed to add this new requirement, revised copies of the Rules and Regulations were sent to all 253 homeowners within days of the meeting. This supposed new change is still a mystery to all 253 homeowners after almost 4 months. As of this morning, the website at http://carterranch.homestead.com/GoverningDocuments.html has yet to be updated to show these supposed new rules and Regulations.

    Thank you in advance for your help.

    I remain,

    Tom Van Dan Elzen


    Coup Fourré

    Comment

    Working...